From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31034 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2004 13:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31024 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2004 13:38:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hub.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 13:38:44 -0000 Received: from smtp.ott.qnx.com (smtp.ott.qnx.com [10.0.2.158]) by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA24593; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:52:38 -0500 Received: from qnx.com ([10.4.2.2]) by smtp.ott.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA11356; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:38:43 -0500 Message-ID: <40618FCD.5010802@qnx.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:38:00 -0000 From: Kris Warkentin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: "Gdb-Patches@Sources.Redhat.Com" Subject: Re: [patch] Bring QNX Neutrino support forward. References: <4060A9C0.1090906@qnx.com> <4060C665.6010405@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <4060C665.6010405@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00556.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: >> Some of this stuff is cosmetic/convenience. I made the macros for my >> nto_target structure testable and moved the comments into the >> structure where they're more useful. >> >> A few things had to do with initializers. Some of the signal >> handling stuff didn't work because other _init functions hadn't been >> called so I moved them out to where they could be called when the >> osabi is initialized. > > > BTW, what was the race condition? The _initialize_* functions were being called in a different order than previously so all my signal initialization stuff was breaking when I put it into my _init* funcs. It was a while ago I changed it (haven't been working on FSF gdb recently) but I believe it was target_signal_from_name.... > >> I added osabi and core sniffers. Some is practical, some is >> future-proofing. If we start supporting multiple targets, I'm going >> to want to be able to swap our various target processors support in >> and out. The is_nto_target type stuff can be made more interesting >> later to do things like check to see if the remote host processor >> matches the binary abi and such. > > > You should also be able to kill off regset_core_fns, it's been > superseeded by regsets (which reminds me ....). Must have not seen that thread. I'll look into it. cheers, Kris