From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8764 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2004 21:31:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8756 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2004 21:31:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2004 21:31:53 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107772B9B; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:31:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4060ACC8.10209@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton Cc: Bob Rossi , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gdbheads@gnu.org Subject: Re: Feb's patch resolution rate References: <20040225040059.GB19094@white> <16456.65451.461753.66554@localhost.redhat.com> <20040306155700.GA9439@white> <20040311132508.GA2504@white> <20040323130900.GA17339@white> <4060A523.6010801@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2 >>> - typical (median) review time is 1 day > > >>> - average review time is ~2.5 days > > > I assume these only count the resolved patches? Because: Obviously, hence the ~. The median, however, would not change. As you note: > Admittedly, the sample is somewhat > skewed: there aren't normally so many patches to dead areas of the > testsuite. And that has, in part, just been resolved. BTW, did you ever get round to doing an analysis on who was reviewing the symbol table patches. Andrew