From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4880 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 15:03:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4863 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 15:03:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 15:03:33 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14792B92; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:03:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <405B0BC3.70807@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:03:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , eliz@elta.co.il, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 References: <20040318162402.A32E34B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <4059FC60.2090605@gnu.org> <20040319002701.GB25876@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20040319002701.GB25876@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2 > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>>> > Now we don't get any. And for each user that takes >>>> > the trouble to e-mail us, there are many more users who run into the >>>> > issue and appreciate having a short description of it. >>>> >I think we should keep that part of PROBLEMS as long as gdb has this >>>> >problem. >> >>> >>> Definitly no. > > > What do we gain by removing something that continues to be a major > problem from the file named PROBLEMS? I just don't get it. Please read my most recent reply from yesterday. Andrew