From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24009 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 22:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23949 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 22:11:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 22:11:24 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EC12B99; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:13:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4058B17E.8010207@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 References: <20040317182127.0A43D4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040317182127.0A43D4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00412.txt >>I don't think it should retain regressions since 5.3, the file is >>> stating problems in this release, not the last one. > > > These are still problems in this release. They haven't been fixed. There are problems in all the releases, we don't list them. The objective here is to draw the users attention to places where gdb is both better and worse than the _last_ release (6.0). Not a sorry list of problems dateing back to version 0.0. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24009 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 22:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23949 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 22:11:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 22:11:24 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EC12B99; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:13:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4058B17E.8010207@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 References: <20040317182127.0A43D4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040317182127.0A43D4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.1k-gF_JgjWwhw6mQwO877PCCZSdfZgntmJNSszIeeHg@z> >>I don't think it should retain regressions since 5.3, the file is >>> stating problems in this release, not the last one. > > > These are still problems in this release. They haven't been fixed. There are problems in all the releases, we don't list them. The objective here is to draw the users attention to places where gdb is both better and worse than the _last_ release (6.0). Not a sorry list of problems dateing back to version 0.0. Andrew