From: "Pedro Alves" <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
To: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Enhance backtrace for microsoft system DLL calls
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4053daab0712100931yb44d6e4m51ab3072f1406187@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001c83b4a$573b4560$05b1d020$@u-strasbg.fr>
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Muller wrote:
> I had troubles when trying to backtrace
> when the debugge was stopped
> inside the windows DLL's.
>
> After some investigation, I
> found out that many exported routines
> from the Microsoft operating system
> start with a no-op assembler instruction
> 'mov %edi,%edi'.
That's placed there for hot patching, together with 5 bytes of slack before the
function (the idea is to be able to replace that 2 byte op with a jump to
5 bytes back, and patch the 5 bytes with a jump into anywhere in the
32-bit address space.)
Something like:
nop |
nop |
nop | hot patching
nop | support
nop |
mov %edi,%edi | <-- function start
-----------------------------------+
push %ebp |
mov %esp,%ebp | frame setup
sub $0x18,%esp | locals, ...
Could you add a comment explaining that as well?
> The main question is whether this patch is acceptable
> for gdb as it is in a i386 common file, while
> it most probably only applies to MS operating system.
>
> The problem is that I found no other location where
> this could be done, but maybe someone in the list
> has a better overview and a good idea where to put that.
>
You can put a flag in i386's gdbarch_tdep (look in
i386-tdep.h, and i386-cygwin-tdep.c).
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-10 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-10 16:45 Pierre Muller
2007-12-10 17:37 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2007-12-10 18:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-10 18:41 ` Pedro Alves
2007-12-11 10:44 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-12-11 17:29 ` Pierre Muller
2008-01-14 10:16 ` [RFC-v2] " Pierre Muller
2008-01-24 0:52 ` Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 17:51 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-01-25 14:16 ` [RFA] i386-tdep.c: Add i386_skip_noop function Pierre Muller
2008-01-25 16:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-25 16:46 ` [RFA] i386-tdep.c: Add i386_skip_noop function; updated Pierre Muller
2008-01-25 17:05 ` Mark Kettenis
2008-01-25 17:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2008-01-25 18:50 ` Pierre Muller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4053daab0712100931yb44d6e4m51ab3072f1406187@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox