From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11107 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2007 08:55:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 11095 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2007 08:55:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:55:28 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b11so1573190nfh for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.54.3 with SMTP id c3mr5533071fga.1193734525488; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.71.2 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4053daab0710300155l1683bbd4n907f8b7a35fd378f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:02:00 -0000 From: "Pedro Alves" To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, insight@sourceware.org Subject: Re: syms_from_objfile() warnings and win32-nat.c IO redirection (Was: suppress annoying warnings about cygwin1.dbg) In-Reply-To: <20071030012739.GB28693@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46833EB0.E8ABC8CB@dessent.net> <20071011195327.GB8200@caradoc.them.org> <470FFB00.9909C731@dessent.net> <47101DB4.6010204@portugalmail.pt> <20071024184207.GA10943@caradoc.them.org> <4725378D.5010800@portugalmail.pt> <4053daab0710290203q5aa79bam6a8e87e5c6a837ba@mail.gmail.com> <20071029123318.GA16009@caradoc.them.org> <47266460.10204@portugalmail.pt> <20071030012739.GB28693@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 717b3f885fd5162b X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00791.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Chris, Brian, would it be possible to instead fix the > > cygwin1.dbg generation to do something similar to > > the above recipe? > > No need to ask anyone. Just make the changes you're proposing and see > if they work. > Language barrier, I guess. I was not asking for you to do it. I was trying to ask if you foresee any problems in doing it, since you were the one who wrote the dllfixdbg thing. The "ask before you spend a bunch of time in it for nothing" theme. I'll see if I can test it in a few days... Cheers, Pedro Alves