From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31001 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2004 09:23:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30993 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2004 09:23:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO miranda.se.axis.com) (193.13.178.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2004 09:23:05 -0000 Received: from axis.com (ironmaiden.se.axis.com [10.13.8.120]) by miranda.se.axis.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5local0.1) with ESMTP id i249MtnI025662; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4046F56F.3010402@axis.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:23:00 -0000 From: Orjan Friberg Organization: Axis Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/CRIS] Prologue scan bug fixes, return_value implementation References: <40460A69.2060600@axis.com> <20040303164450.GA18032@nevyn.them.org> <40460ED4.4040201@axis.com> <40462836.1080706@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <40462836.1080706@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00066.txt Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Yes. Since the absolute worst possible outcome for such a commit is you > breaking the CRIS architecture, it is entirely up to you to decide if > its worth the risk :-) 78 new PASS in gdb.base makes it worth the risk ;-). (Committed to trunk and branch.) -- Orjan Friberg Axis Communications From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31001 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2004 09:23:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30993 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2004 09:23:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO miranda.se.axis.com) (193.13.178.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2004 09:23:05 -0000 Received: from axis.com (ironmaiden.se.axis.com [10.13.8.120]) by miranda.se.axis.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5local0.1) with ESMTP id i249MtnI025662; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4046F56F.3010402@axis.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: Orjan Friberg Organization: Axis Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/CRIS] Prologue scan bug fixes, return_value implementation References: <40460A69.2060600@axis.com> <20040303164450.GA18032@nevyn.them.org> <40460ED4.4040201@axis.com> <40462836.1080706@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <40462836.1080706@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.gv5nj8x_x84KSS-3GuxnV0LT_ehh9Cn3EdBkJvfw30s@z> Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Yes. Since the absolute worst possible outcome for such a commit is you > breaking the CRIS architecture, it is entirely up to you to decide if > its worth the risk :-) 78 new PASS in gdb.base makes it worth the risk ;-). (Committed to trunk and branch.) -- Orjan Friberg Axis Communications