From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1634 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2004 23:24:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1622 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2004 23:24:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.170.238) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2004 23:24:33 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F88E2B98; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:50:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40411B47.9060508@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:24:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: Andreas Schwab , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Skip .cvsfiles in src-release; Was: [rfa/binutils] distclean .cvsignore? References: <4040D628.50205@gnu.org> <4040E14C.6090607@gnu.org> <4040F391.30401@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00868.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney writes: > > >>> The attached modifies src-release to prune .cvsignore when building a >>> release. Any problems with this one? (note, I'm still testing it, >>> chug, chug). > > > This is fine with me. Dunno who maintains those top-level files. We (as in GDB and BINUTILS) get to maintain "src/src-release". > I personally think that it is time to drop this antiquated > requirement. But I won't stop you from trying to adhere to it. "I wish". If only people would stop building GDB on 8.3 systems ... Andrew