From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11956 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2004 15:20:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11949 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2004 15:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.170.238) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2004 15:20:56 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F6F2B98; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:20:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4040B1D7.4090805@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of tui/tui.c References: <200402281503.i1SF3p8g011820@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200402281503.i1SF3p8g011820@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00821.txt.bz2 > Ouch. We have serious portability problems with the TUI. We should > either disable it again before the 6.1 release, or be prepared to > release 6.1.1 if any build problems come up. I'm sure we'll see build > problems on many systems that we don't regularly test. > > Anyway, I committed the attached such that FreeBSD (and probably the > other BSD's work again/. It works on my bsd system (how do you think I was testing it)? What portability problem. Is there a reason for changing "" to <>, it breaks some of GDB's scripts. Andrew