From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24953 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2004 21:04:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24946 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2004 21:04:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 21:04:47 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3AA2B92; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:04:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403E5F6C.4050001@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:04:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fnf@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix incorrect use of "until" command in gdb.arch/gdb1431 References: <200402192003.08113.fnf@ninemoons.com> In-Reply-To: <200402192003.08113.fnf@ninemoons.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00777.txt.bz2 > The gdb.arch/gdb1431 command is using the "until" command incorrectly. > As currently defined, that command ONLY stops at a point within the > current frame or upon return from the current frame. You have to use > the "advance" command to stop at a frame called by the current frame > or a frame called by a caller of the current frame. Hmm, "How did it ever work"? :-) I guess so, but keep the 1531.c specific test file - we've had our fingers burt when trying to use the one test source file on multiple tests. Andrew > 2004-02-19 Fred Fish > > * gdb.arch/gdb1431.c: Remove. > * gdb.arch/gdb1431.exp: Reuse test file from PR 1291 and use > "advance" correctly instead of "until" incorrectly. >