From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23250 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2004 20:58:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23229 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2004 20:58:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 20:58:16 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0801B2B92; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:58:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403E5DE5.4030409@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable DWARF-2 frames on S/390 References: <200402181645.RAA19463@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> In-Reply-To: <200402181645.RAA19463@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00776.txt.bz2 > Hello, > > now that all pieces of the DWARF-2 CFI rework have gone in, and > the big s390 backend reorganization was also committed, this patch > is the only thing that's missing to enable DWARF-2 frame support > on s390. > > Do you think a copyright assignment is required for this? While > it's longer than 10 lines, it doesn't really contain anything > that should be significant w.r.t. intellectual property -- the > s390_dwarf2_frame_init_reg routine only implements the publicly > documented s390 ABI calling convention ... Can you describe the change with one paragraph of english? Andrew