From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21184 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2004 17:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21172 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 17:47:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 17:47:15 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23932B92; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:47:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403B8E21.3020100@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton , Anthony Green Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit/java] Work around java/1565 in jmisc.exp References: <403B77DB.2010401@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00689.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:12:11 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > > >>> This patch modifies jmisc.exp to work around the very very long >>> standing bug java/1565 (just that no one thought to report it?). > > > It's bug java/1164 (with a corresponding GDB PR). As Michael pointed > out, one of the other Java tests already does what you want. It would > be good for this test to be KFAILed, though, given that you're the > second person to have proposed that change in the last two or three > months. No, "jmain.exp" does what I want - test for three potential bugs. The old "jmisc.exp" really isn't doing anything other than causing cascading failures :-( BTW, I looked at KFAILing "jmisc.exp" but dropped the idea like a hot potato - the FAIL is burried deep in the depths of "runto" :-( Andrew