From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5092 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2004 17:21:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5085 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 17:21:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 17:21:31 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9922B92; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:21:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403B8819.3040308@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:21:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , Anthony Green Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit/java] Work around java/1565 in jmisc.exp References: <20040224163332.1721A4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> In-Reply-To: <20040224163332.1721A4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00687.txt.bz2 > This is redundant. jmisc2.exp already does exactly what you want. Hmm, my just posted jmain.exp makes having both jmisc.exp and jmisc2.exp completly redundant. The old jmisc.exp just cascaded failures. Anthony, with jmain.exp, should jmisc2.exp be deleted? Andrew