From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26831 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2004 15:29:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26822 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 15:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 15:29:02 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22FC2B92; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:28:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <403B6DBB.3020106@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Sandiford Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, brolley@redhat.com Subject: Re: Write-after-approval access References: <87ekskona1.fsf@redhat.com> <403B6B4D.5080300@gnu.org> <87r7wkzen5.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87r7wkzen5.fsf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00677.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney writes: > >>> FYI: >>> Write After Approval >>> (alphabetic) >>> >>> To get recommended for the Write After Approval list you need a valid >>> FSF assignment and have submitted one good patch. > > > OK, thanks. Sorry for not seeing that. > > I've had changes to sim/mips accepted in the past, does that qualify? (I wondered about that) Yes, you've had patches approved in the past, so yes you should add yourself. Andrew