From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27754 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2004 15:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27746 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2004 15:58:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2004 15:58:20 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0212B92; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:58:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <402BA29A.3040108@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] qSymbol in remote_wait References: <20040201012229.GA22861@nevyn.them.org> <20040211173240.GA5609@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00317.txt.bz2 > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:22:30PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> As Amit Kale mentioned in December, to support NPTL gdbserver needs to look >> up symbols during remote_wait. The existing qSymbol model assumes that only >> at objfile loads (i.e. during td_ta_new) do we need to look up symbols; NPTL >> looks up symbols lazily when it needs them, which includes at the creation >> of the first child thread. This patch (which, I know, needs a matching >> change for the manual) allows qSymbol: queries as a response to remote_wait, >> in much the same way as the file I/O protocol. >> >> Is this OK? If so I'll write up the documentation change. > > > Ping. Can you please post the proposed protocol change to gdb@. Andrew