From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-30583-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29298 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2004 14:47:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29286 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 14:47:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 14:47:36 -0000
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A37252B92; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:47:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <402A4086.9020702@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:47:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] "tui"
References: <402923AD.7060104@gnu.org> <20040210184009.GA28778@nevyn.them.org> <20040210125326.6ae7e4ba@saguaro> <20040211131122.GA2333@white>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2

> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:53:26PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:40:10 -0500
>> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote:
>> 
> 
>> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:13PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> > > 
>> > > This modifies the build machinery so that the program "tui" is built. 
>> > > "tui" starts up GDB's TUI (or Text User Interface).  Alternative program 
>> > > names include "tgdb", "gdbtui", ...
>> > > 
>> > > Comments?  Otherwize look to commit it round 16th Feb.
> 
>> > 
>> > Any of those names sound great to me.  I think that one with "gdb" in it
>> > would be clearer; unlike Insight, the TUI does not have a separate life
>> > from GDB.
> 
>> 
>> I too would prefer one of the names with "gdb" in it somewhere.
> 
> 
> I would also, I actually like the name gdbtui. It is clear that it is
> GDB, and it is clear that it is the text user interface.

Then:
	tui<tab>
or
	tg<tab>
wouldn't work.

Speaking of which, if that tcl/tk code ever integrated into GDB's code 
base (assuming it's first contributed), it to will need a name: tclgdb, 
tkgdb, and even gdbtk come to mind (ah, the ultimate irony).

Andrew