Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:18:26 -0500 >>From: Jeff Johnston >> >>Ok, how about the accompanying patch? >> >>-- Jeff J. >> >>2004-02-02 Jeff Johnston >> >> * NEWS: Add information about new pending breakpoint support. > > > Thanks. Is it possible to modify the wording so that it doesn't use > passive tense so much? I'm told by native English speakers that > passive is BAD... > > For example, this: > > >>If a breakpoint location cannot be found, you are queried to see if >>you wish to make the breakpoint pending on a future shared-library >>load. > > > could be rephrased like this: > > If a breakpoint location cannot be found, GDB queries you if you > wish to make the breakpoint pending on ... > > Etc., you get the point. > > TIA > > Is the attached ok to commit?