From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21247 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2004 17:03:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21215 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 17:03:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 17:03:06 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04162B92; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:03:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <402125CB.3060908@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:03:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] inside_entry_func() related changes References: <1031122000931.ZM22440@localhost.localdomain> <20040204164734.GB8281@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 > > Revisiting this patch too. I've added documentation and removed the > now-unneeded change to inside_entry_func; does anyone disagree with > this patch? Docs OK? > > A testcase would indeed be nice. Damned if I know how to write one, > though. It's possible to test backtrace past main, and that the command options at least work. Andrew