[patch/rfc] Test struct0

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 547 bytes --]

Hello,

This adds a test for:

	struct foo0 { };

to the structs.exp testcase (I'm assuming that this is legal ISO-C), it 
passes on PPC with stabs with:

> (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/structs.exp: ptype foo1; structs-tc
> p/c fun0()
> $1 = {<No data fields>}

Tt was intended for completness, however with a dwarf2 compiler:

amd64$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-24)

> (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/structs.exp: ptype foo1; structs-tc
> p/c fun0()
> $1 = <incomplete type>

I guess I should file a bug report and kfail it?

Andrew

[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2696 bytes --]

2004-02-03  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/structs.c (struct struct0): Define.
	(foo0, L0): New variables.
	(fun0, Fun0): New functions.
	(main): Call fun0 and Fun0.
	* gdb.base/structs.exp: Test zero sized structure.
	(foo): Add output from an empty struct.  

Index: testsuite/gdb.base/structs.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 structs.c
--- testsuite/gdb.base/structs.c	20 Nov 2003 17:11:55 -0000	1.5
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/structs.c	3 Feb 2004 23:34:47 -0000
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
 typedef tQ tR;
 #endif
 
+struct  struct0 {};
 struct  struct1 {tA a;};
 struct  struct2 {tA a; tB b;};
 struct  struct3 {tA a; tB b; tC c; };
@@ -105,6 +106,7 @@
 struct struct17 {tA a; tB b; tC c; tD d; tE e; tF f; tG g; tH h; tI i; tJ j; tK k; tL l; tM m; tN n; tO o; tP p; tQ q; };
 struct struct18 {tA a; tB b; tC c; tD d; tE e; tF f; tG g; tH h; tI i; tJ j; tK k; tL l; tM m; tN n; tO o; tP p; tQ q; tR r; };
 
+struct  struct0  foo0 = {}, L0;
 struct  struct1  foo1 = {'1'}, L1;
 struct  struct2  foo2 = {'a','2'}, L2;
 struct  struct3  foo3 = {'1','b','3'}, L3;
@@ -124,6 +126,10 @@
 struct struct17 foo17 = {'1','b','3','d','5','f','7','h','9','j','B','l','D','n','F','p','H'}, L17;
 struct struct18 foo18 = {'a','2','c','4','e','6','g','8','i','A','k','C','m','E','o','G','q','I'}, L18;
 
+struct struct0  fun0()
+{
+  return foo0;  
+}
 struct struct1  fun1()
 {
   return foo1;  
@@ -198,6 +204,15 @@
 }
 
 #ifdef PROTOTYPES
+void Fun0(struct struct0 foo0)
+#else
+void Fun0(foo0)
+     struct struct0 foo0;
+#endif
+{
+  L0 = foo0;
+}
+#ifdef PROTOTYPES
 void Fun1(struct struct1 foo1)
 #else
 void Fun1(foo1)
@@ -408,6 +423,7 @@
 #endif
   int i;
 
+  Fun0(foo0);	
   Fun1(foo1);	
   Fun2(foo2);	
   Fun3(foo3);	
@@ -435,6 +451,7 @@
   while (1)
     {
       zed ();
+      L0  = fun0();	
       L1  = fun1();	
       L2  = fun2();	
       L3  = fun3();	
Index: testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 structs.exp
--- testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp	4 Jan 2004 15:04:41 -0000	1.17
+++ testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp	3 Feb 2004 23:34:47 -0000
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
 
 proc foo { n } {
     return [lindex {
-	"{}"
+	"{<No data fields>}"
 	"{a = 49 '1'}"
 	"{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
 	"{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
@@ -481,6 +481,7 @@
 # original "structs" test was doing.
 
 start_structs_test { tc }
+test_struct_calls 0
 test_struct_calls 1
 test_struct_calls 2
 test_struct_calls 3