From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9109 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2004 14:17:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9101 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 14:17:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 14:17:55 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD9D2B92; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:17:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <401E5C12.1040708@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:17:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Roland McGrath , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] auxv support References: <200401310013.i0V0DnGE018646@magilla.sf.frob.com> <20040201060419.GA22586@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:13:49PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > >> For some reason I didn't get your message directly (yet anyway), though >> I've now seen it in the mailing list archives. > > > List reply bites again. If you are not subscribed to gdb-patches, > please use a reply-to or something along those lines... otherwise I > assume it was just mail lag. Please, no - Reply-to is bad m'kay! As posters to this list we should assume that the people we interact with are not subscribed, and hence, we should not (at least in general) trim CC lines. Andrew