From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26194 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2004 14:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26187 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 14:09:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (65.49.4.239) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 14:09:11 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CD02B8F; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:09:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <400FD985.9040506@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Centralize DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK handling from infrun References: <20040117222007.GA23563@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00609.txt.bz2 Is it possible to determine the need for the decrement based solely on the knowledge of how the thread was resumed (step, run, ...)? In the remote case there isn't convenient access to the list of currently inserted breakpoints. Andrew