Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>,
	Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc/testsuite] Test GDB on not-so-little core files
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <400E0CCC.7020906@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040121044245.A9C6A4B359@berman.michael-chastain.com>

> BTW, Michael, any thoughts on how to fail this on systems that can't 
>> efficiently dump a 3g core file?  Skip the test I guess, but with which 
>> mechanism?  untested?
> 
> 
> Unconditional UNTESTED is simple and good.  "Hey, what happened with
> the 3 gigabyte core dump test?"  "Oh, it says UNTESTED".  It's pretty
> clear to me what that means.
> 
> As for *how* to do it, that is harder.
> 
> The real issue is that the criterion is not really "what is the target
> triple", but "what are the resources of the specific test bed".  Like,
> Daniel J says that it would be awkward to enable it in the Debian
> version.  And it's useless for me on HP Test Drive, because I run into a
> ulimit at 1 gigabyte.  That's a property of HP-TD policy, not of the
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 target.  I dunno how to encode that kind of
> criterion in the test suite.

Daniel, did you get to try this test?

So far the problem I've hit is with kernel's that can't write generate 
core files - they end up really trying to write write / consume gb worth 
of disk.  Fortunatly those OSs families should be easy to identify and skip.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-21  5:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-21  4:42 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-01-21  5:23 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-21  8:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-01-14 14:56 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-01-14 15:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-14 15:16   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-14 15:38     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-14 15:44       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-15 19:09     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-15 19:13       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-20 22:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-14  3:11 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-01-14 14:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-14  2:40 Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=400E0CCC.7020906@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox