From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14726 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2004 15:28:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14713 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 15:28:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 15:28:26 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCAE2B8F; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:28:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4002BD19.1060704@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:28:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: mi/ChangeLog et.al. References: <20040111221854.158014ACDA@berman.michael-chastain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00314.txt.bz2 > Also, if you want precedents for the names I suggested, gdb/tcl/ has > ChangeLog files with the .NNNN extension. For what its worth I think the only deciding factor here is the presence gdb/ChangeLog-YYYY file name convention. If those didn't exist, or had adopted a different convention, we'd be following that. (I kind of like the .NNNN choice but its now too late. Well, unless we rename all the other ChangeLog files that is :-) enjoy, Andrew