From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30986 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 08:29:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30938 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 08:29:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 08:29:35 -0000 Received: from laocoon (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72]) by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906DB18F; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:34:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020709102517.0242ccd0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 01:40:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii , Mark Kettenis From: Pierre Muller Subject: Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <200207082046.g68KkQo00587@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 At 07:07 09/07/2002 , Eli Zaretskii a écrit: >On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 14:45:02 -0400 > > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > > I would also be in favor of putting it into the branch, but I > > > don't know who should decide this.... > > > > Something for the i386 maintainers to decide. > > > > I have no objections > >Me neither. OK, I commited this also to gdb_2_2-branch Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99