From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20199 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2002 12:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20100 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 12:16:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.7) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 12:16:30 -0000 Received: from laocoon (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72]) by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA21759; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:16:21 +0100 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020220124517.024e25f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 04:16:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii From: Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFC] document Cygwin native specific commands Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <4.2.0.58.20020220111422.014f0140@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00527.txt.bz2 At 12:18 20/02/2002 , Eli Zaretskii a écrit: >On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Pierre Muller wrote: > > > Thus I looked at the subsection above concerning DJGPP > > specific commands, but there I find a kindex entry > > for : > > "info dos" > > "sysinfo" > > but nothing for ldt gdt idt dos subcommands.... > > Shouldn't there be > > @kindex info dos > > ... > > @kindex info dos sysinfo > > ... > > @kindex info dos ldt > > @kindex info dos gdt > > @kindex info dos idt > > ????? > >I didn't include the subcommands on purpose. The reason is that it is >not useful to have several index entries that all begin with the same >string and point to the same page in the manual. That is why I only >indexed "info dos". > >So I guess my assertion about ``every command'' should have been >qualified by this exception. Sorry for confusion. But why did you kindex sysinfo and not the other ones? > > So > > -- should I use > > @kindex set shell > > ? > >Yes. That is how all "set ..." commands are indexed in the manual, >AFAICS. OK! > > -- shouldn't in be a w32 subcommand ? > >Sorry, I don't understand: the command is "set shell", not "set w32 shell", >right? If so, you should have "@kindex set shell". No I was asking if this "set shell " command should not be replaced by a "set w32 shell" command. But I am not sure how this could be done... because add_show_from_set and add_set_cmd are special functions. Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99