From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29240 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2002 15:20:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29134 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 15:20:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.7) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 15:20:00 -0000 Received: from laocoon (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72]) by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA04437; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:19:52 +0100 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020204161801.01af6210@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 07:20:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii From: Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFA] Add handling of Ctrl-Break for win32 native target. Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <4.2.0.58.20020204155705.01b6f3b8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 At 16:08 04/02/2002 , Eli Zaretskii a écrit: >On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Pierre Muller wrote: > > > Ctrl-Break exception is not handled by > > current win32-nat.c code. > > > > The following patch fixes this. > >IMHO, this should be mentioned in the manual somewhere (as a >Windows-specific issue). I don't undersantd what you mean here: should we document this as a known limitation of the win32 native target up to 5.1.1 or should we specify that Ctrl-Break gets also caught in newer versions of GDB? Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99