From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11847-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26367 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 16:15:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26293 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2002 16:15:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.7)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2002 16:15:07 -0000
Received: from laocoon (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72])
	by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA00959;
	Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:14:44 +0100
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020111170518.020b3178@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:15:00 -0000
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC 2] Remove hardware break and watchpoints at
  program exit.
Cc: kettenis@science.uva.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <7704-Fri11Jan2002160358+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <4.2.0.58.20020111143044.019c7e50@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 <4.2.0.58.20020111125745.0135ea48@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 <4.2.0.58.20020111125745.0135ea48@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 <4.2.0.58.20020111143044.019c7e50@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2

At 15:03 11/01/2002 , Eli Zaretskii a écrit:
> > Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:38:40 +0100
> > From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
> > 
> >   The code does already generate a claim for i386 linux:
> > the linux code tries to write the dr registers using ptrace
> > but as the process is already finished, this fails.
> > See i386-linux-nt.c line 741.
>
>Why does the Linux port try to do that after the debuggee has died?

There was no problem before my patch,
because before my patch, 
remove_breakpoint was never called for a dead debuggee.
So its just that the code was not adapted to my change...
Anyway this is no big deal, I will try to send a new patch handling this very soon.


Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07  Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99