From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11086 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2002 09:26:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11045 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2002 09:26:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.7) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2002 09:26:17 -0000 Received: from laocoon (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72]) by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA32053 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:26:16 +0100 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20020108102529.021d6ac8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 01:26:00 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFA 2] Debug register support in win32-nat.c In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020108101832.01d2c410@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 At 10:20 08/01/2002 , vous avez écrit: > This is a follow up of my first >proposal for win32 debug register support >(which enables hardware watchpoints, >I never tested the hardware breakpoints, as they don't have >much advantages over normal breakpoints on i386 processors). Sorry, I forgot to add the link http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-11/msg00537.html and all the follow-ups. Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99