From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16161 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2001 09:04:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15545 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 09:03:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.7) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2001 09:03:14 -0000 Received: from laocoon (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72]) by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA32458; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:03:03 +0100 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011211100013.00a4cc68@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 01:04:00 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii From: Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Add hardware watchpoint support for cygwin target. Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <20011210193213.GD25811@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 At 09:14 11/12/2001 , Eli Zaretskii a écrit: >On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > It would be nice if the maintainers for the ports that you tested > > were to confirm or deny the behavior that you've noticed. > >I thought the problem Pierre was raising in the message you replied to >(messages coming out of GDB, supposedly when shared libraries, >a.k.a. DLLs, were loaded) was specific to the Cygwin port. Did I miss >something? Yes, because I saw the same behavior for i386 linux port of GDB 5.1 release. See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-12/msg00268.html for a simple test to reproduce the behavior on that target. Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99