From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29324 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2001 10:23:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29083 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 10:21:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.7) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 10:21:51 -0000 Received: from laocoon (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72]) by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA15777 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 11:21:45 +0100 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20011210111416.013e24f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 02:23:00 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Add hardware watchpoint support for cygwin target. In-Reply-To: <20011208005809.GB27247@redhat.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20011206092315.016150f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <8011-Wed28Nov2001201312+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <4.2.0.58.20011128183252.00acd198@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <8011-Wed28Nov2001201312+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <4.2.0.58.20011206092315.016150f0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 At 01:58 08/12/2001 , Christopher Faylor a écrit: >On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:37:23AM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote: > >This is probably an UI_OUT specific problem, but as its again not > >cygwin specific I don't think that there is any reason to delay > >approval. > >Have we seen independent corroboration of the bugs that you reported? I am not sure I understand your question. Do you ask if someone else saw this unwanted 'Hardware watchpoint : ....' messages. I don't know, nobody explicitly did respond to the messages by saying that this is indeed the case, but the way to reproduce them is quite straight forward: Compile gdb 5.1 from FSF sources, run ./gdb ./gdb from the build/gdb dir. add a hardware watchpoint at gdb_stdlog for instance with 'top-gdb>watch gdb_stdlog' and run simply with 'run' This gave me several print out of the 'Hardware watchpoint' besides the correct one. (Probably one for each shared lib loaded, but I didn't check this). Andrew acknowledged that this was a separate problem in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-12/msg00178.html Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99