From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id oA2hAW5TPGPffQUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 11:38:22 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 02E131E112; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:38:22 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=wcD47HEd; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41091E0D5 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:38:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AFF3858424 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:38:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F0AFF3858424 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1664897901; bh=WcppExya+0C234hRIyHScsyw+FGaLaUCiyo5xOY4Dlo=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=wcD47HEdygbkQgk10yncBGZP5ldXlVCog/BlBPrOO8X/idhqsBzRQeSQQlF+WYMNJ viiar6YjMFw84ad0kQr8a8UenJ8mSQoBo+VGiNtaccVrS5YBWtVJi+L/4XBPtG1xqi Iw4Y1IbrAGHuBV763tuwrJmexqkyraNrdFVRIQJ4= Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12F93858CDA for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:38:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C12F93858CDA Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09451219D2; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB684139D2; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 97KGM1dTPGMcFgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:37:59 +0000 Message-ID: <3ef424f2-f0f6-e470-01cb-b8990f5489d7@suse.de> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:37:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/build] Add gdb/contrib/makeinfo-dummy.sh Content-Language: en-US To: Tom Tromey , Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches References: <20220901095108.GA29248@delia> <095e64ca-4595-188a-c28f-70080b0133b5@simark.ca> <157567c8-3042-bcf9-f38f-3f983af79c28@suse.de> <2a454b57-20fa-fcd9-4d1e-719c0567d871@suse.de> <87illh6etu.fsf@tromey.com> In-Reply-To: <87illh6etu.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tom de Vries Cc: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 9/20/22 21:11, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches writes: > > Tom> I gave the --without-makeinfo a try. > > Tom> WDYT? > > It seems reasonable to me. Thanks for the review. I've posted it to the gcc ml: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602797.html . > FWIW I think there is at least one bug in bugzilla on this topic. There's https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14678 which is mostly about the GDBvn.texi issue, which should already be fixed by commit ab954e4a53c ("Fix building gdb release from tar file without makeinfo"). But there's indeed duplicate https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20417 which does mention --without-makeinfo. Thanks, - Tom