From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id m0WYOcFJ8mI6qSMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 07:49:21 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id DDF661E5EA; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:49:21 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Ad+6MPDm; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 913C91E222 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 07:49:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111C63856DC5 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:49:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 111C63856DC5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1660045760; bh=8OWGV3yKo81e7M/79btSw+C/37TWcXKI1CojUvF0/Ac=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=Ad+6MPDmIsPzOl9N5VEU2KrsgedCjsY/XRQSAWtLJ3Hp1qCRbi2vKml0zDJgyxat4 MUM8ki48G0bR14wGCt7zv1+5CEmdCePv+20u0OEk1nKYw2YJo5DxJiWCVGMfoC5ujg 57itsV2Dee0CMoFivDrBH8wTQjQm5GVs+bC7Rl6w= Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B03043857824 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:49:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B03043857824 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFEFA372C7; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFBCC13A9D; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 11:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id tIilMatJ8mLaewAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 11:48:59 +0000 Message-ID: <3e626a17-5ea7-2ad7-d7c6-433b52dc3ea7@suse.de> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:48:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Arm] Fix endianness handling for arm record self tests Content-Language: en-US To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20220808101203.168954-1-luis.machado@arm.com> <6fe1ae85-a72a-e256-1c88-f9a9b303c0b8@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tom de Vries Cc: mark@klomp.org, Andrew Burgess Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 8/9/22 13:31, Luis Machado wrote: > I guess, though I was going to rework the patch based on Andrew's > comments. Didn't get to it yet though. Ah, I hadn't seen Andrew's review. For some reason I wasn't cc-ed, perhaps that infuriating mailman CC rewriting again. Thanks, - Tom