From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2839 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2020 15:45:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2830 invoked by uid 89); 1 Feb 2020 15:45:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*M:3c6f X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Feb 2020 15:45:29 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 408191E5FA; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:45:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Propose we release GDB 9.1 next weekend (Feb 01-02) To: Jonah Graham , Joel Brobecker Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves , Iain Buclaw , Nick Alcock , Eli Zaretskii References: <20200126114033.GA20733@adacore.com> <20200201121720.GA30012@adacore.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <3e5c6bc8-30f5-3c6f-b301-1153a6cf9416@simark.ca> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 15:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On 2020-02-01 7:57 a.m., Jonah Graham wrote: > Can fullname field (at least in MI output) continue to be > realpath_fullname concept and if needed in MI a new field added for > absolute_fullname? In the CLI output users see just file > (../src/main2.c), but that is not generally useful in the IDE case as > it is display only. The MI documentation doesn't say anything about what that fullname field should contain, in fact it's just shown in examples and never formally described. But given that it has contained the realpath for years, this is what the IDEs/users expect, so I indeed think we should make sure it stays that way. > Tom If you decide to revert (which would be my preference) I will > happily work with you to get this back in. I previously wrote a > testcase for the simple case that did already get fixed, I can work on > a testcase for the new case too for the suite if it helps. > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-08/msg00421.html Thanks, that will be useful. Simon