From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id DtuBEfdkmmDdOQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:05:27 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3A86A1F11C; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:05:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294D51E783 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 07:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9080038618DF; Tue, 11 May 2021 11:05:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9080038618DF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1620731125; bh=Q8M2lvCYP0pglIk/RU6KzbCmYag18B2eSg1ltI3AwZk=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=EW2Jw3nGeuY7NmETyxASPJElPVB7bbQuDVg3FMu1Bcbf38VpY7WTp2YTPVoB3ABns /9u4m4mP/y+rSFj54ItAb9HDR081iS/oBJ1ztKQ89c7sOtFV5xuKq2mziURP1BnDPV GID54EEBFZMhOa7oAxVsVm1DSxf1rMTz9urPc1Zw= Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79CA5385E440 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 11:05:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 79CA5385E440 Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id o27so18234198qkj.9 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 04:05:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q8M2lvCYP0pglIk/RU6KzbCmYag18B2eSg1ltI3AwZk=; b=CHBR4Cqlo52b7FeyG8xX4B8kHUdYa7mZW/j9Sc1qxCKFeACrAACRL6D3IUa2Aq1bdv DV0pONuAIKum2o3WJdtA8o4ygm1kP+DOuj/gb1CpSXFS5tNH3Onlk3RjayPmNehPElQ+ PtHf6OT8s+lppRzyIn2NArBknLpyext/kU45nrHmRSlN4R8J7pyFUIeCr+Vm9SiQd0bn 9ioyPHkHI5kayufmlP3fVnjuP0efswHGqwvNC304kkNBlbH44uYfLhx6FPZvGq7vFeTE MAhn4qShsCwyXwBXD8WULR6wc0IM5FJMyoHxOTRClF5s3+EiopyKz53tXBZuk8q5qdsR GL0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+tmYvouOEoVnFXPYslTGfGezv4sKAgVKZWcrXT8DxaUrdm02P 0ZOsn78u2qVew3dvQAI1deIqj+gL3ppKxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlRlRzL07YU1/+ZZVfgTO27wm4qQVe7sxGBC/WE1zy8Dyxq8+lPSE2N8zWu5jNiR3zhEj83A== X-Received: by 2002:a37:384:: with SMTP id 126mr28580778qkd.387.1620731123066; Tue, 11 May 2021 04:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:7f0:4841:40ad:215f:36bd:5b9a:ad6? ([2804:7f0:4841:40ad:215f:36bd:5b9a:ad6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y1sm11645491qkp.21.2021.05.11.04.05.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 May 2021 04:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: start of the GDB 11 release cycle To: Joel Brobecker References: <20210510000448.GA4371@adacore.com> <995340af-3cef-e322-0887-3a76bc6ad34d@linaro.org> <20210510221133.GE3261@adacore.com> Message-ID: <3d9892f7-8299-96a9-bc66-fd83fa5659cc@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 08:05:20 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210510221133.GE3261@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Luis Machado via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 5/10/21 7:11 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi Luis, > >> For issues, I have a couple that I'd like to get fixed for AArch64 MTE >> before GDB 11. I'll file those in bugzilla and will set the fields >> accordingly. >> >> In terms of features, I'd really like to get AArch64 MTE core file support >> (dumping registers and memory tags) in before GDB 11. I don't expect it to >> be a big change, but I'm still polishing the series so I can submit it. >> >> Given this step needs coordination with the kernel, there might be delays >> here and there. Do you think that will be acceptable? > > Do you have a rough idea of how long this would take? > I have an implementation I can send within a couple weeks. From the kernel's side, we just need to agree on the core file format. So my guesstimate is 3 to 4 weeks.