From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46429 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2018 17:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 46418 invoked by uid 89); 8 Apr 2018 17:29:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-Greylist:Sun X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:29:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D424476FB9; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6712166BAE; Sun, 8 Apr 2018 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use an std::vector for inline_states To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180407144205.20909-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <6bcda047-7dbd-79ed-8eec-2bd5d59f6749@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <3d8cc397-b7d5-b705-bf5f-8eff154eb587@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:29:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 On 04/08/2018 12:21 AM, Simon Marchi wrote: > > /* Forget about any hidden inlined functions in PTID, which is new or > @@ -112,36 +102,34 @@ allocate_inline_frame_state (ptid_t ptid) > void > clear_inline_frame_state (ptid_t ptid) > { ... > - for (ix = 0; VEC_iterate (inline_state_s, inline_states, ix, state); ix++) > - if (ptid_equal (state->ptid, ptid)) > - { > - VEC_unordered_remove (inline_state_s, inline_states, ix); > - return; > - } > + auto it = std::find_if (inline_states.begin (), inline_states.end (), > + [&ptid] (const inline_state &state) > + { > + return ptid == state.ptid; > + }); > + > + if (it != inline_states.end ()) > + inline_states.erase (it); Should this erase be unordered_remove as well? Otherwise LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves