From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 8.1 release branch created!
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d75778f-5c91-5680-b9fa-c2f2c902ff67@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83fu6sln4o.fsf@gnu.org>
On 2018-01-26 09:18 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Ping! Ping! Ping! This is delaying the release of GDB 8.1.
>
> Should I just stop waiting for approval and push this?
Hi Eli,
I didn't reply to your pings because I don't feel qualified to review changes related
to mingw (you are probably the most qualified person here, since you use it). Given
the lack of response, I'd say you can go ahead with the change, tt seems relatively safe.
I have one question below.
>> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 18:58:30 +0200
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:52:53 +0200
>>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>
>> Ping! Ping! OK to push this?
>>
>>> Ping! Is it OK to install the patch proposed below?
>>>
>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 19:31:37 +0200
>>>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>>>
>>>> g++ -x c++ -O2 -gdwarf-4 -g3 -I. -I. -I./common -I./config -DLOCALEDIR="\"d:/usr/share/locale\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./../include/opcode -I./../opcodes/.. -I./../readline/.. -I../bfd -I./../bfd -I./../include -I../libdecnumber -I./../libdecnumber -I./gnulib/import -Ibuild-gnulib/import -DTUI=1 -Id:/usr/include -Id:/usr/include/guile/2.0 -Id:/usr/include -Id:/usr/Python26/include -Id:/usr/Python26/include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-unused -Wunused-value -Wunused-function -Wno-switch -Wno-char-subscripts -Wempty-body -Wunused-but-set-parameter -Wunused-but-set-variable -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-narrowing -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized -Wno-format -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -fwrapv -c -o python/py-arch.o -MT python/py-arch.o -MMD -MP -MF python/.deps/py-arch.Tpo python/py-arch.c
>>>> In file included from d:\usr\lib\gcc\mingw32\6.3.0\include\c++\math.h:36:0,
>>>> from build-gnulib/import/math.h:27,
>>>> from d:/usr/Python26/include/pyport.h:235,
>>>> from d:/usr/Python26/include/Python.h:58,
>>>> from python/python-internal.h:94,
>>>> from python/py-arch.c:24:
>>>> d:\usr\lib\gcc\mingw32\6.3.0\include\c++\cmath:1157:11: error: '::hypot' has not been declared
>>>> using ::hypot;
>>>> ^~~~~
>>>> Makefile:1618: recipe for target `python/py-arch.o' failed
>>>>
>>>> Googling suggests the following solution; is it okay to push this
>>>> (with the necessary logs and after doing the "paperwork" required for
>>>> branch changes)? Or does someone have better ideas? (Does this work
>>>> in MinGW64?)
>>>>
>>>> --- gdb/python/python-internal.h~0 2018-01-12 05:31:04.000000000 +0200
>>>> +++ gdb/python/python-internal.h 2018-01-16 08:56:10.717759900 +0200
>>>> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@
>>>> #define HAVE_SNPRINTF 1
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> +/* Another kludge to avoid compilation errors because MinGW defines
>>>> + 'hypot' to '_hypot', but the C++ headers says "using ::hypot". */
>>>> +#if defined(__MINGW32__) && defined(__cplusplus)
Do we need "defined(__cplusplus)", since we are always building GDB as a C++ program?
Thanks,
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <announce.20180105041805.3FC35808E9@joel.gnat.com>
2018-01-16 17:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-16 19:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-16 19:46 ` [PATCH] Fix warning on gdb/compile/compile.c (C++-ify "triplet_rx") Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-17 15:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-17 17:17 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-17 23:07 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-17 23:42 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-17 23:48 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-16 20:32 ` [PATCH] Fix unitialized warning on gdb/typeprint.c:whatis_exp Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-17 15:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-17 16:48 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-17 18:03 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-20 1:03 ` [PATCH] Fix segfault when using 'set print object on' + whatis <struct> Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-22 17:42 ` [PATCH v2] Fix segfault when using 'set print object on' + whatis <struct> (Re: [PATCH] Fix segfault when using 'set print object on' + whatis <struct>) Pedro Alves
2018-01-22 18:04 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-22 19:53 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-22 20:11 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-16 20:36 ` [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 8.1 release branch created! Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-17 3:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-17 16:46 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-17 11:04 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-17 16:38 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-01-17 16:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-17 16:50 ` Pedro Alves
2018-01-17 18:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-18 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-25 16:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-26 14:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-26 15:37 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2018-01-26 18:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-27 16:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-01 15:12 ` Yao Qi
2018-02-01 16:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-01 16:51 ` Yao Qi
2018-02-01 17:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-01 21:32 ` Yao Qi
2018-02-02 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-02-02 15:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-02-02 16:27 ` Simon Marchi
2018-02-02 17:42 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d75778f-5c91-5680-b9fa-c2f2c902ff67@ericsson.com \
--to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox