From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 89676 invoked by alias); 30 May 2019 14:03:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 89668 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2019 14:03:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=mega, explain, super X-HELO: mail-wr1-f65.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f65.google.com) (209.85.221.65) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 May 2019 14:03:17 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id t4so4296933wrx.7 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 07:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:4eeb:42ff:feef:f164? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:4eeb:42ff:feef:f164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a124sm3970131wmh.3.2019.05.30.07.03.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 May 2019 07:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] Lock the demangled hash table To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20190529212916.23721-1-tom@tromey.com> <20190529212916.23721-5-tom@tromey.com> <25f1c05d-c2ef-d229-1eef-1029186070b3@redhat.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <3cc2c842-21ae-990e-3d32-75c72dfad6eb@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 14:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <25f1c05d-c2ef-d229-1eef-1029186070b3@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00694.txt.bz2 On 5/30/19 1:58 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > A single lock for every table compared to a lock per table might be > a good approach, but I'd welcome extended comments to explain > that design choice. Just to be sure something wasn't lost in translation here: by "extended" above, I just meant that I'd like to see comments extended in that direction, not that I'd like to see super mega long comments. :-) Thanks, Pedro Alves