From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76712 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2017 14:44:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 76699 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2017 14:44:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=authority X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:44:19 +0000 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 33) id 8B3F01E190; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:44:18 -0500 (EST) To: Matthew Malcomson Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix bug with command `printf "%s\n", $_as_string($pc)` X-PHP-Originating-Script: 33:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:44:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <8e018305-1691-1049-412f-7f668075bfd1@gmail.com> References: <959cdc8e-1e54-a2e7-53d0-d80aaaea9ea8@gmail.com> <1d49ea752aae175256c0278bf3a999bc@polymtl.ca> <1cbe8b68-b592-825a-c662-56096ef0f795@gmail.com> <2da82ddc637e4d9fb61ee5b446a94c57@polymtl.ca> <8e018305-1691-1049-412f-7f668075bfd1@gmail.com> Message-ID: <3a8a8dbe6fd0ce32b7c756fe83405f26@polymtl.ca> X-Sender: simon.marchi@polymtl.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00702.txt.bz2 On 2017-02-26 08:20, Matthew Malcomson wrote: > I've attached the patch with correct formatting because my email > client replaces tabs with spaces. I'll leave the changelog entries as > you suggested. Just a heads up for others, the patch does not apply for me, I think because it has CRLF line terminators. When I convert it to LF it applies fine. Just one comment: void *malloc (size_t size) should be: void * malloc (size_t size) Otherwise, the patch looks good to me. Now you just have to wait until somebody with actual authority looks at it :).