From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Search symbols via quick API
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:09:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a3d5ad7-0637-4125-b72d-91afc7982cc3@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402-search-in-psyms-v2-0-ea91704487cb@tromey.com>
On 2025-04-02 19:44, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This series changes how symbols are looked up in gdb.
>
> Currently, symbol lookup is done in two phases. In one phase, gdb
> searches all existing symtabs for a symbol. In another phase, gdb
> will call expand_symtabs_matching to expand some symtabs.
>
> Different spots in gdb may order these phases differently -- so some
> places will expand symtabs and then search the compunits, but other
> places will first search expanded symtabs and then use the
> expand_symtabs_matching callback to add further results.
>
> This approach has a few drawbacks.
>
> * The double search means that some discrepancies between the indexer
> and the full reader go unnoticed. This may arguably be a strength
> of the approach, though frequently a carefully crafted test case can
> show this as a bug. Essentially, though, some searches only work by
> accident.
>
> * Searching all expanded symtabs means that, as a debug session drags
> on, searches will examine many irrelevant symtabs.
>
> * In some places, the two phases use different code to perform the
> actual search, meaning that the results can depend on previous CU
> expansion decisions.
>
> * Similarly, if just a single symbol is needed, then both approaches
> are bad: expand-then-search will be unnecessarily inefficient, while
> search-then-expand approach means that the result depends on which
> CUs happen to have already been expanded.
>
> This series changes all of this. Now, all symbol lookups are done via
> the "quick" API, with the idea being that the final search of the
> expanded symtab is done via the expand_symtabs_matching callback.
>
> This fixes all the issues pointed out above:
>
> * Only relevant symtabs are searched, because the index only considers
> matching symbols.
>
> * Some discrepancies between the indexer and the full reader show up
> as symbol lookup failures. Others (if the indexer thinks a symbol
> exists but the full reader does not) will just be inefficient -- but
> we could add a verifier for this.
>
> * Lookups are no longer dependent on symtab expansion state, because
> again the indexer is pre-filtering the matches.
>
> Re-reading the series -- it's been in development for quite a while
> and I've already landed ~20 preliminary patches -- shows that there
> are still a few cleanups in here that could perhaps have gone in
> separately.
>
> Anyway, the essential change is to make the implementations of
> expand_symtabs_matching also call the callback when a symtab has
> already been expanded. After this, most of the work is cleaning up
> individual callers.
>
> This change lead to some surprising places. For example, I had to
> rewrite the .gdb_index reader, because the work done for
> "templates.exp" simply never worked in this mode -- and the test
> obscured the problems, a classic case of lookups working by accident.
>
> I regression tested each patch in this series. Furthermore I
> regression tested the series as a whole using the cc-with-debug-names
> and cc-with-gdb-index target boards. All of this was done on x86-64
> Fedora 40.
>
> I think maybe I've separately submitted "Ada import functions not in
> index" patch. Anyway it's part of this series now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
> ---
I went over the series but not in depth. I like how it simplifies the
symbol lookup functions and how it makes things less error prone. You
can add:
Acked-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Since it touches a lot of different code, I think you should merge it
soon, to avoid having to deal with more conflicts. I also have some
stuff that I will need rebase on top of this, so I would like to get to
it sooner than later.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 23:44 Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] Add another minor hack to cooked_index_entry::full_name Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] Change ada_decode to preserve upper-case in some situations Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] Emit some type declarations in .gdb_index Tom Tromey
2025-04-21 2:50 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-21 14:50 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 4:11 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-23 20:54 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] Ada import functions not in index Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] Fix index's handling of DW_TAG_imported_declaration Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] Put all CTF symbols in global scope Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] Restore "ingestion" of .debug_str when writing .debug_names Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] Entries from anon-struct.exp not in cooked index Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] Remove dwarf2_per_cu_data::mark Tom Tromey
2025-04-21 3:09 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-21 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 4:12 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] Have expand_symtabs_matching work for already-expanded CUs Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 15:53 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-23 20:39 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 20:57 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] Rewrite the .gdb_index reader Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 17:22 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-23 20:50 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-24 14:37 ` Pedro Alves
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] Convert default_collect_symbol_completion_matches_break_on Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] Convert gdbpy_lookup_static_symbols Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] Convert ada_add_global_exceptions Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] Convert ada_language_defn::collect_symbol_completion_matches Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] Convert ada-lang.c:map_matching_symbols Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] Remove expand_symtabs_matching Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] Simplify basic_lookup_transparent_type Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] Remove objfile::expand_symtabs_for_function Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] Convert linespec.c:iterate_over_all_matching_symtabs Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] Simplify block_lookup_symbol_primary Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] Pass lookup_name_info to block_lookup_symbol_primary Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] Simplify block_lookup_symbol Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] Add best_symbol_tracker Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] Convert lookup_symbol_via_quick_fns Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] Convert lookup_symbol_in_objfile Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] Make dw_expand_symtabs_matching_file_matcher static Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 20:00 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-23 20:09 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 20:44 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-02 23:45 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] Remove enter_symbol_lookup Tom Tromey
2025-04-23 20:09 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2025-04-24 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 00/28] Search symbols via quick API Tom Tromey
2025-04-28 14:07 ` Guinevere Larsen
2025-04-28 22:06 ` Tom Tromey
2025-04-29 19:31 ` Guinevere Larsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a3d5ad7-0637-4125-b72d-91afc7982cc3@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox