From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24201 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 20:33:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24194 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 20:33:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 20:33:05 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108882B8F; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:33:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FFDBE80.2090603@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:33:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] KFAIL EBUSY kernel bug References: <3FFDB9A7.4090801@redhat.com> <20040108202006.GA13474@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:12:23PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Ref: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1502 >> Turns out that the EBUSY error status value I was seeing is a Linux >> Kernel bug. This KFAIL's that case. >> >> baring problems, I'll commit in a few days > > > If it's a Linux kernel bug, that makes it an XFAIL, not a KFAIL. Oops, yes (I had my Red Hat kernel, rather than FSF GDB glasses on). >> 2004-01-08 Andrew Cagney >> >> * gdb.base/fileio.exp: For "Renaming a directory to a non-empty >> directory returns ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST", treat EBUSY as a KFAIL. > > > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer