> On 24 Oct 2018, at 16:14, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> And what does "to ensure FUNC resolving" mean too, btw?
>>> AFAICT, the only reason to use a shared library is to
>>> compile it with or without debug information, right?
>>> Come to think of it, you could instead eliminate the
>>> shared library and compile a separate .o file instead, right?
>>> That would simplify the testcase a bit and expose it to more
>>> targets.
>>> 
>> 
>> I could only get the bug to expose itself when using a .so
>> 
>> If I do the following using current HEAD then the bug is not present:
>> 
>> g++ -c condbreak-solib-main.cc -o condbreak-solib-main.o -fno-inline
>> g++ -c condbreak-solib-lib.cc -o condbreak-solib-lib.o -fno-inline
>> g++ condbreak-solib-main.o condbreak-solib-lib.o
>> 
>> It causes the type of the return value to be detected as
>> TYPE_CODE_PTR->TYPE_CODE_INT.
> 
> Huh.  That's really strange.  Where is that pointer coming from?
> 
> What does "ptype cmp3" say for you?
> 
> (gdb) b foo if (int)cmp3("abc") == 1
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x40048b
> (gdb) ptype cmp3
> type = <unknown return type> ()
> (gdb) whatis cmp3
> type = <text variable, no debug info>
> 

Yes, I get the same.

Sounds to me like there might still be an issue in gdb? Or at least
a difference in the way the type is calculated.
This on it’s own is still a good fix, so I’ll send a new version.


> I wonder if what you're looking at is actually the malloc call?
> GDB will call malloc to allocate space for the "abc" string in
> the inferior.  Look at the backtrace, see where the call is coming
> from.


With the nodebug and debug shared library version:
(I need to run to main before I can set breakpoint on cmp3, otherwise
"Function "cmp3" not defined.”)

But with all versions, when stopped at cmp3, I get:
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00000000004005d4 in cmp3(char const*) ()
#1  <function called from gdb>
#2  0x00000000004005a4 in foo() ()
#3  0x00000000004005bc in main ()

> 
> Actually, because of that, I think it would be better (more focused)
> to pass in a variable instead of "abc".  You already have the
> unused variable "word" there:
> 
> const char *word = "stuff";
> 
> So:
> 
> (gdb) b foo if (int)cmp3(word) == 1
> 
> but please rename it to something else, because I tried that
> locally and there's another symbol called "word"
> in glibc's localeinfo.h, and gdb picks that one up.

Will do.
Using this still causes the bug in HEAD, so that’s ok.


> 
> Also, is there a reason for the test to be a C++ program?
> If there's none, it'd be better to make it a C program, again
> to expose it to more targets.


Switching to C causes the bug to vanish.
This is because C++ uses gnuv3_pass_by_reference(), and the
segfault happens inside there, whereas C uses
default_pass_by_reference(), which just returns 0.

I’ll expand the test to cover both C and C++.


Alan.�&���j�!z�޶��ם}�Yb�֫rn��r�