Re: [PATCH: gdb/mi] -stack-list-locals testcase

[Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>]

> *** mi-stack.exp.~1.10.~    2002-11-05 15:43:18.000000000 +0000
> --- mi-stack.exp    2004-01-05 23:38:27.000000000 +0000
> ***************
> *** 57,63 ****
>       # -stack-list-frames 1 3
>         mi_gdb_test "231-stack-list-frames" \
> !         "231\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee4\",file=\".*basics.c\",line=\"8\"\},frame=\{level=\"1\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee3\",.*\},frame=\{level=\"2\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee2\",.*\},frame=\{level=\"3\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee1\",.*\},frame=\{level=\"4\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"main\",.*\}\\\]" \
>                   "stack frame listing"
>       mi_gdb_test "232-stack-list-frames 1 1" \
>           "232\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"1\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee3\",.*\}\\\]" \
> --- 57,63 ----
>       # -stack-list-frames 1 3
>         mi_gdb_test "231-stack-list-frames" \
> !         "231\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"0\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee4\",file=\".*basics.c\",line=\"7\"\},frame=\{level=\"1\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee3\",.*\},frame=\{level=\"2\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee2\",.*\},frame=\{level=\"3\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee1\",.*\},frame=\{level=\"4\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"main\",.*\}\\\]" \
>                   "stack frame listing"
>       mi_gdb_test "232-stack-list-frames 1 1" \
>           "232\\^done,stack=\\\[frame=\{level=\"1\",addr=\"$hex\",func=\"callee3\",.*\}\\\]" \
> 
> This test (and the rest of mi-stack.exp) is passing on a PPC/NetBSD gcc 2.96 stabs system.  We'll need to look at it more carefully (or check michaelc's test matrix) to see why there's a failure.  MI is more strict  with its test results. 

Nick, what's your exact system?  On amd64 and i386 GNU/Linux systems 
(RHEL 3, dwarf 2, gcc 2.3.2 based) mi-stack.exp I'm also seeing this 
pass (puzzled).

Andrew