From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 736 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2004 15:32:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 728 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2004 15:32:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2004 15:32:38 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA21E2B8F; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:32:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FF98396.3060700@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 15:32:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix do_cleanups if oldchain is NULL References: <3FE0C502.7020408@redhat.com> <3FF59719.7020908@gnu.org> <20040102175138.GB11549@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 > > How about making NULL an internal error then, as below? I think we > should either do that or document its behavior, and it seems > accident-prone. I thought about that, and would likely be ok if there were only normal simple cleanups. Its the "other" (i.e., final, run, exec, ...) cleanups that trouble me. Andrew