From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29495 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2003 22:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29484 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 22:47:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (65.49.0.121) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 22:47:14 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9AB2B8F; Sat, 6 Dec 2003 17:47:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FD25C6C.90601@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 22:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Johnston" Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] more structs.exp kfails References: <3FCF727F.6030807@redhat.com> <3FCFAB3B.8030609@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > > The attatched tweaks structs.exp so that it KFAILs the case where a "return struct" fails because the target hasn't implemented the relevant code. > > Jeff and I were puzzling over an apparent regression in the ia64 - this better clasifies it as something that is known to have never worked. > > So, jeff, if it works for you, I'll commit it in a day or so, > Andrew > > The patch works but it uncovers two separate bugs. 1. printing long doubles on the ia64 is hosed 2. once fixing printing long doubles, doing a p/c on a long double value causes it to spit out the hex bytes of the long double > > That doesn't affect whether you should check this in. I will shortly post a fix for the ia64-tdep file. Thanks, committed. Andrew