From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4222 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 21:46:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4215 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 21:46:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 21:46:36 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F61280018E; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:46:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FCFAB3B.8030609@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:46:00 -0000 From: "J. Johnston" Organization: Red Hat Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] more structs.exp kfails References: <3FCF727F.6030807@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3FCF727F.6030807@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > The attatched tweaks structs.exp so that it KFAILs the case where a > "return struct" fails because the target hasn't implemented the relevant > code. > > Jeff and I were puzzling over an apparent regression in the ia64 - this > better clasifies it as something that is known to have never worked. > > So, jeff, if it works for you, I'll commit it in a day or so, > Andrew The patch works but it uncovers two separate bugs. 1. printing long doubles on the ia64 is hosed 2. once fixing printing long doubles, doing a p/c on a long double value causes it to spit out the hex bytes of the long double That doesn't affect whether you should check this in. I will shortly post a fix for the ia64-tdep file. -- Jeff J.