Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> But then the registers aren't marked as cached at all, so they're now 
>> requested from the target each time you do "info all-registers", even 
>> though they come up with 0s. Should I pretend the registers not 
>> supplied by the target were 0, or should I mark them as unavailable 
>> (i.e. the same as what having an "x" does) so at least it's consistent?
> 
> 
> Ah, they should be supplied but with a value of zero.  The protocol (for 
>  historic reasons) specifies that a short G packet should have the 
> missing entries treated as zero (like you intended).

Good, in which case the attached patch (against 6.0) should do it. Mostly 
indent changes, boringly enough.


2003-12-04  Jonathan Larmour  <jifl@eCosCentric.com>

	* remote.c (remote_fetch_registers): If target doesn't supply
	registers, set them to zero.

Thanks,

Jifl
-- 
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine