From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5478 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2003 22:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5466 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2003 22:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2003 22:04:21 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAPM4KH31721 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:04:20 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAPM4Ja23426; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:04:19 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAPM4IH18190; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:04:18 -0800 Message-ID: <3FC3D1E2.9030908@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 22:04:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-o64-extract-return-value References: <3FBC13EC.1040202@redhat.com> <3FBC1782.3000908@gnu.org> <3FBD31F5.6080201@redhat.com> <3FBD3819.1020302@gnu.org> <3FBD6497.9040600@redhat.com> <3FBE39CB.8030203@redhat.com> <3FBE893B.2030300@redhat.com> <3FBEAA0B.90005@gnu.org> <3FBEB549.1060401@redhat.com> <20031122010539.GA22205@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20031122010539.GA22205@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:00:57PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > >>Andrew Cagney wrote: >> >>>>Right -- I meant *these* changelog entries: >>>> >>>>[msnyder@reddwarf gdb]$ grep sysv_abi_return_value ChangeLog >>>> * ppc-tdep.h (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >>>> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >>>> (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >>>> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >>>> * ppc-sysv-tdep.c (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): New function. >>>> * ppc-tdep.h (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare. >>>> (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare. >>>> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): New function. >>>> >>>> >>>>Sorry, I'm lost. What's wrong with those ChangeLogs? >>>> >>>>s/abi_return_value/abi_store_return_value/g >>> >>> >>>What? >> >>;-) >>Honest, I didn't mean to make a federal case out of this -- >>your original suggestion to me was to look for a function called >>"ppc_sysv_abi_return_value". That function doesn't exist -- but >>there are several references to it in the changelog. I eventually >>figured out that it was missing the word "store_", as in >>"store_return_value". So I asked if you'd like me to fix up >>the change log entries, so they would match the actual function name. >> >>Sorry for the confusion... > > > Try current CVS? > > ppc-sysv-tdep.c:ppc_sysv_abi_return_value D'oh, you're right, my bad. Sorry Andrew -- you must have thought I was nuts...