From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-28857-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31035 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2003 16:02:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31027 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 16:02:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 16:02:33 -0000
Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 153212B8F; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:02:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3FC22B93.1080106@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:02:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: DW_AT_frame_base fix for complicated frames
References: <20031002165606.GA22819@nevyn.them.org> <vt23cebikyv.fsf@zenia.home> <20031009142637.GC29621@nevyn.them.org> <3F857B4B.9000708@redhat.com> <20031124043408.GA19791@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00517.txt.bz2

> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:14:19AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> 
> 
>> >Thanks.  I've committed this to trunk and branch.  I also moved this to
>> >the branch:
>> >
>> >2003-10-09  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>
>> >
>> >        Merge from mainline:
>> >        2003-07-31  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>
>> >
>> >        * dwarf2read.c (new_symbol): Use var_decode_location for 
>> >        parameters.
>> >
>> >Location expressions and lists should work reasonably well on both now.
> 
>> 
>> Can you please add something to the NEWS file.  That way the 6.0.1 
>> announcement will include information letting the user decide if they 
>> need to upgrade.
> 
> 
> Going through my email backlog...
> 
> Should I bother, or have we written off 6.0.1?

I suspect 6.0.1 is a writeoff, but the NEWS entry in mainline will still 
help.

Andrew