From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31383 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2003 21:53:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31374 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 21:53:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 21:53:02 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hALLr1H04420 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:53:01 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hALLr0a27286; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:53:00 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hALLqxH10542; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:52:59 -0800 Message-ID: <3FBE893B.2030300@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:53:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-o64-extract-return-value References: <3FBC13EC.1040202@redhat.com> <3FBC1782.3000908@gnu.org> <3FBD31F5.6080201@redhat.com> <3FBD3819.1020302@gnu.org> <3FBD6497.9040600@redhat.com> <3FBE39CB.8030203@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3FBE39CB.8030203@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00451.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>>>> Rather than doing the same thing for store_return_value, take a >>>>> look at the PPC's "ppc_sysv_abi_return_value". >>>> >>>> >>>> Grep grep... ah, you mean ppc_sysv_abi_STORE_return_value. >>>> Shall I fix your change log entries for you? ;-) >>>> >>>> >> >>> no? >>> >>> $ grep ppc_sysv_abi_store_return_value ChangeLog >>> (ppc_sysv_abi_store_return_value): Delete function. >>> (ppc_sysv_abi_store_return_value): Delete. >>> * ppc-tdep.h: (ppc_sysv_abi_store_return_value): Declare. >>> (ppc_sysv_abi_store_return_value): New function. >>> > >> Right -- I meant *these* changelog entries: >> >> [msnyder@reddwarf gdb]$ grep sysv_abi_return_value ChangeLog >> * ppc-tdep.h (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >> (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Ditto. >> * ppc-sysv-tdep.c (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): New function. >> * ppc-tdep.h (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare. >> (ppc_sysv_abi_return_value): Declare. >> (ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value): New function. > > > Sorry, I'm lost. What's wrong with those ChangeLogs? s/abi_return_value/abi_store_return_value/g