From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7312 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2003 01:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7305 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2003 01:23:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (65.49.0.121) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 01:23:24 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1112B8F; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:23:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FBC1782.3000908@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:23:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, cagney Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-o64-extract-return-value References: <3FBC13EC.1040202@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00415.txt.bz2 > Hi Andrew, > > This change fixes 100s of FAILs for mips64-elf, 'cause gdb can't > find the function's return value. It follows some work that you > were apparently doing w.r.t. the mips internal register representation. > > I suspect that the same thing needs to be done for mips_eabi_extract..., > but I haven't tested that. What do you think? Ok. > I'll probably try doing something similar for store_return_value too. Rather than doing the same thing for store_return_value, take a look at the PPC's "ppc_sysv_abi_return_value". BTW, rumour has it that GCC finally fixed MIPS struct return. http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/mips-abi.html Andrew